Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary motif of this article is to present a theoretical focus on the problematic of women’s participation in the Indian media industry. This article includes a critique of capitalism and its influence on the space afforded to women in the field of visual media in India. Through citing relevant examples from the recent past in the television news media industry, the author has investigated theoretically and aesthetically the image and perception of the woman on the screen and behind the screen. The article deals with the spectator-spectacle dynamics, and has sought to locate dissent and establish that there is always possible a reversal in the setting; the spectator may be as challenged into “seeing” as the spectacle is in “showing.” There is a focus on the phenomenon of becoming, self-becoming and reclaiming the screen. Finally, the article seeks to discuss the malleable nature of technology that may not only oppress women but may also beused by women to frame alternate relations to visuality and narration. The article argues how the dominant politics in India curates ideologies most divorced from rationality and equality to undermine the cause of women and artistic advent of visual feminism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".