Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of fashion involvement and hedonic consumption tendency on positive emotions, the influence of fashion involvement, hedonic consumption tendency and positive emotion on impulse buying, and the role of positive emotions mediate the influence of fashion involvement and hedonic consumption tendency toward impulse buying on fashion products Discovery Shopping Mall Kuta. The method used to determine the sample is non-probability in the form of purposive sampling with sample size of 105 respondents. Data collection was done by distributing questionnaires directly to customers of fashion products Discovery Shopping Mall Kuta. The analysis technique used is path analysis and sobel test. There is a positive and significant relationship between fashion involvement and hedonic consumption tendency toward positive emotion, positive and significant relationship between fashion involvement, hedonic consumption tendency and positive emotion toward impulse buying. Positive emotions can act as significant mediation variables between the influence of fashion involvement and hedonic consumption tendency toward impulse buying.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it