MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941135474 · doi:10.5937/tehnika1902279s

Dimensions of organizational culture in multinational enterprises

2019· article· en· W2941135474 on OpenAlexaff
Vesna Spasojević-Brkić, Branislav Tomić, Aleksandar Brkić, Nikola Dondur, Sonja Josipović

Bibliographic record

VenueTehnika · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinational corporationOrganizational cultureBusinessKnowledge managementCompetence (human resources)Empirical researchOrganizational learningOrganization developmentSample (material)Organizational performanceMarketingPublic relationsManagementComputer sciencePolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organizational culture is a consequence of the limitations of rational methods in interpreting organizational reality. The subject of this paper is to analyze different dimensions of organizational culture, with special emphasis on multinational companies. After a detailed overview of the available literature, the dimensions of the organizational culture were tested on a sample of 200 manufacturing companies that are part of the supply chain of a large multinational company. According to the results of the conducted empirical research, the dominant dimensions of organizational culture are risk management, developed communication in the organization, setting measurable objectives and tasks, possessing a developed formalized system of procedures and their use, applying reward system, solving conflicts in the organization, investing in knowledge and competence of employees and their regular improvement and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTehnikaSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207