MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941200441

Fire history and secondary vegetation succession in the forest-tundra near Churchill, Manitoba

2004· article· en· W2941200441 on OpenAlex
Kimberly M. M. Monson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChurchill Northern Studies CentreParks Canada
KeywordsEcological successionTundraVegetation (pathology)Fire historyForestryGeographyPhysical geographyEcologyGeologyClimate changeArcticOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concerns about increasing CO2, in the global atmosphere and how this may affect climatic patterns and ultimately the structure, composition and distribution of the northern boreal forest prompted an examination of secondary succession in a segment of forest-tundra south of Churchill, Manitoba. Fire is the main disturbance in the boreal forest and climate change is expected to have an impact on the frequency of fire and the area burned in these forests. By reconstructing the fire history of these forests, we can evaluate the potential effects a change in fire activity will have upon this landscape. In addition to our lack of knowledge on fire in the forest-tundra of Manitoba, little is also known about the response of the vegetation and forest stand dynamics following fire. The fire history of the Churchill, Manitoba forest-tundra was reconstructed following the determination of the time-since-last-fire (TSLF) dates from 119 locations using dendroecological methods. The dates were used to create a TSLF map. A bootstrapping procedure was used prior to the fire frequency analysis. The point data used for the bootstrap analysis was coded by forest type (black spruce, white spruce and eastern larch). Area data from the TSLF map and frequency data from the bootstrap analysis were converted into 25-year age classes and used to produce reverse cumulative area/frequency distributions to assess possible changes in the fire-cycle. The fire-cycle for homogenous fire periods was calculated using 1) natural fire rotation (area data) and 2) fire frequency analysis fitted to an negative exponential model (area and frequency data). All forest groupings showed a change in the fire-cycle in the AD 1700's to a longer fire-cycle. Using the natural fire rotation (NFR) the fire-cycle has changed from 345 years to 558 years at AD 1725...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it