MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941301608 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2019.2907665

3-D Numerical Modeling for the Magnetization of Superconductors Using a Local Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method

2019· article· en· W2941301608 on OpenAlexafffund
Yann-Meing Law, Damien Tageddine, Steven Dufour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsDiscontinuous Galerkin methodFinite element methodGalerkin methodDiscretizationMultiphysicsNonlinear systemPhysicsMathematical analysisMaxwell's equationsNumerical analysisApplied mathematicsMathematicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical methodology is proposed to discretize a nonlinear low-frequency approximation to Maxwell's equations using a local discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element method, with an upwind-like numerical flux, for modeling superconductors. In this paper, we focus on high-temperature superconductors (HTS) and the electrical resistivity is modeled using a power law. Nodal elements and the Whitney element are used. Numerical studies have been performed to verify the proposed methodology: a problem with a manufactured solution, the nonlinear magnetic front problem, and the magnetization of HTS wires. Based on the final time that can be reached for a given time-step size, the proposed strategy is compared with the H formulation discretized using the Galerkin finite element method with the Whitney element for the magnetic front problem. The proposed local DG strategy allows the use of a larger time-step size over a longer time interval, particularly, when we use the Whitney element. The proposed methodology can also capture sharp gradients of the current density with limited spurious oscillations. The numerical results are in agreement with Bean's model for large values of power-law's exponent. The proposed local DG strategy could be generalized to more complex electrical resistivity models, including multiphysics models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207