MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941326963 · doi:10.1002/mame.201900142

Printability of Methacrylated Gelatin upon Inclusion of a Chloride Salt and Hydroxyapatite Nano‐Particles

2019· article· en· W2941326963 on OpenAlexafffund
Patricia Comeau, Thomas L. Willett

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGelatinSwellingMaterials scienceBiomaterialDynamic mechanical analysisViscosityChemical engineeringModulusSelf-healing hydrogelsDynamic modulusComposite materialPolymer chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract 3D biomaterial printing requires an ink to have suitable printability characteristics, as well as creating a final construct of controllable swelling and stiffness. To tune such properties, the impact of adding different levels of chloride salts (NaCl and CaCl2) and hydroxyapatite nano‐particles (nHA) to a highly concentrated and photo‐crosslinkable methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) is investigated. By adding up to 100 mmCaCl2or 1.11mNaCl, the GelMA viscosity decreases from that of control GelMA (no salt). Interestingly, a 25G needle and strong photo‐polymerization kinetics are able to overcome the low viscosity of the 50CaG ink during printing. Adding further CaCl2increases GelMA viscosity, while decreasing both the swelling and dynamic modulus of the UV‐cured construct observed in water. As all UV‐cured constructs have a dynamic modulus greater than 1 MPa, this novel system is able to match the dynamic modulus of articular cartilage—a feat not previously reported for a GelMA‐based system. Lastly, nHA inclusion improves ink printability, as well as decreases swelling and increases dynamic modulus of the final construct. Overall, this study leads to the successful development of a new advanced functional ink which will be beneficial in the 3D printing of biomaterials toward tissue engineering applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Materials and EngineeringSame topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207