Manipulating Interfacial Nanostructure to Achieve High‐Performance All‐Solid‐State Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract All‐solid‐state lithium‐ion batteries (ASSLIBs) have gained substantial attention worldwide due to their intrinsic safety and high energy density. However, the large interfacial resistance of ASSLIBs, which originates from the interfacial reactions and inferior electrode–electrolyte contact between electrodes and solid electrolytes, dramatically constrains their electrochemical performance. Here a dual shell interfacial nanostructure is rationally designed to enable high‐performance ASSLIBs, in which the inner shell LiNbO 3 suppresses the interfacial reactions while the outer shell Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 enables intimate electrode–electrolyte contact. As a result, the dual shell structured Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 @LiNbO 3 @LiCoO 2 exhibits a high initial specific capacity of 125.8 mAh g −1 (1.35 mAh cm −2 ) with an initial Coulombic efficiency of 90.4% at 0.1 C and 87.7 mAh g −1 at 1 C. More importantly, in situ X‐ray absorption near edge spectroscopy was performed for the first time to reveal the interfacial reactions between Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 and LiCoO 2 . This dual shell nanostructure demonstrates an ideal interfacial configuration for realizing high‐performance ASSLIBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it