Pengaruh brand image terhadap keputusan pembelian produk Adidas di Paris Van Java Bandung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industri produk olahraga saat ini sangat kompetitif dalam menentukan bentuk, warna dalam merek produknya. Brand image merupakan hal yang paling penting jika produk menjadi lebih kompleks dan ramai dipasaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh brand image terhadap keputusan pembelian produk Adidas di Prasi Van Java Bandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatifdengan jenis penelitian deskriptif-kausalitas. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan metode nonprobability sampling dengan insidental sampling menggunakan sebanyak 100 responden. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan yaitu analisis regresi linear berganda. Berdasarkan hasil uji hipotesis secara parsial menunjukkan bahwa keunggulan dan keunikan merek berpengaruh terhadap keputusan pembelian. Hasil koefisiensi determinasi brand image berpengaruh terhadap keputusan pembelian sebear 64,3% dan sisanya sebesar 35,7% dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak diteliti dalam penelitian ini.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".