MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941590321 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2911891

Two-Port Network Theory-Based Design Method for Broadband Class J Doherty Amplifiers

2019· article· en· W2941590321 on OpenAlexafffund
Yue Li, Xiaohu Fang, Ayman Jundi, Hai Huang, Slim Boumaiza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAmplifierAdjacent channelAdjacent channel power ratioPredistortionWidebandComputer scienceElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new methodology for designing wideband Class J Doherty power amplifiers (DPAs). The paper begins by presenting a network analysis that leads to a set of design equations to govern the synthesis of the combiner network parameters that satisfy Class J load requirements. The combiner network produces a complex-to-complex Doherty load modulation capable of avoiding potential transistor voltage clipping due to a mismatch between the fundamental and harmonic impedances. Consequently, this method improves the high power AM-AM characteristic and reduces the DPA's peak power variation versus frequency. A wideband Class J DPA was designed as a proof-of-concept demonstrator to operate from 2.7 GHz to 4.3 GHz. Under continuous wave stimuli, over the entire band, the measured AM-AM distortion in the Doherty region of the fabricated DPA was found to be lower than 1.2 dB with a relatively constant output power of 38.9 ± 0.3 dBm at saturation. Moreover, good drain efficiencies of about 42% and 54% were recorded at 6-dB output back-off and saturation powers, respectively. In addition, the linearizability of the fabricated DPA was confirmed under both intra- and inter-band carrier-aggregated signal stimuli. In fact, measurements using an 80 MHz inter-band carrier-aggregated signal revealed that the proposed DPA could deliver an adjacent channel leakage ratio of better than -48 dBc after digital pre-distortion with a good average drain efficiency of 45% - 49% over the entire band of interest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207