MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942309913 · doi:10.1051/ro/2019043

A Non-Linear-Threshold-Accepting Function Based Algorithm for the Solution of Economic Dispatch Problem

2019· article· en· W2942309913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRAIRO - Operations Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationEconomic dispatchComputer scienceHarmony searchBenchmark (surveying)HeuristicsHeuristicElectric power systemAlgorithmPower (physics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces a novel heuristic algorithm based on Non-Linear Threshold Accepting Function to solve the challenging non-convex economic dispatch problem. Economic dispatch is a power system management tool; it is used to allocate the total power generation to the generating units to meet the active load demand. The power systems are highly nonlinear due to the physical and operational constraints. The complexity of the resulting non-convex objective cost function led to inabilities to solve the problem by using analytical approaches, especially in the case of large-scale problems. Optimization techniques based on heuristics are used to overcome these difficulties. The Non-Linear Threshold Accepting Algorithm has demonstrated efficiency in solving various instances of static and dynamic allocation and scheduling problems but has never been applied to solve the economic dispatch problem. Existing benchmark systems are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed heuristic. Additional random instances with different sizes are generated to compare the adopted heuristic to the Harmony Search and the Whale Optimization Algorithms. The obtained results showed the superiority of the proposed algorithm in finding, for all considered instances, a high-quality solution in minimum computational time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it