Abstract 15439: Obese Children With Concentric Hypertrophy and Impaired Cardiac Strain: A Potentially High-risk Subgroup Identified With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Obesity affects nearly one in five children and is associated with increased risk of premature death. Heart disease may contribute to this premature death. We aimed to use cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to comprehensively assess the prevalence and severity of heart disease in obese children, with the hypothesis that obese children have cardiac remodeling and impaired cardiac function compared to healthy weight children. Methods and Results: Twenty obese (age 12 ± 3 years, 60% female) and 20 healthy weight children (age 13 ± 3 years, 50% female) underwent CMR, including both standard cine imaging and displacement encoded imaging, for a complete assessment of left ventricular (LV) structure and function. After adjusting for age, obese children had a 27% increase in LV mass (p <0.001, Figure 1A) and a 12% increase in LV thickness (obese = 5.5 ± 0.7 mm, healthy = 5.0 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.01). This evidence of cardiac remodeling was present in obese children as young as age 8. Forty percent of obese children had concentric hypertrophy, 40% had normal geometry and 20% had either eccentric hypertrophy or concentric remodeling. LV ejection fraction and peak strains were not different between the healthy weight and obese groups. However, peak longitudinal strain showed a significant relationship with the type of LV remodeling, and was most impaired in obese children with concentric hypertrophy (Figure 1B). Conclusions: Obese children show evidence of significant heart disease, which begins as young as age 8. The presence of concentric hypertrophy in 40% of obese children along with the association with impaired cardiac strain in these children may represent a high-risk subgroup. Given the associations between pediatric obesity and early mortality, these early signs of heart disease in obese children demand further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".