A Unified Smart Chinese Medicine Framework for Healthcare and Medical Services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Smart Chinese medicine has emerged to contribute to the evolution of healthcare and medical services by applying machine learning together with advanced computing techniques like cloud computing to computer-aided diagnosis and treatment in the health engineering and informatics. Specifically, smart Chinese medicine is considered to have the potential to treat difficult and complicated diseases such as diabetes and cancers. Unfortunately, smart Chinese medicine has made very limited progress in the past few years. In this paper, we present a unified smart Chinese medicine framework based on the edge-cloud computing system. The objective of the framework is to achieve computer-aided syndrome differentiation and prescription recommendation, and thus to provide pervasive, personalized, and patient-centralized services in healthcare and medicine. To accomplish this objective, we integrate deep learning and deep reinforcement learning into the traditional Chinese medicine. Furthermore, we propose a multi-modal deep computation model for syndrome recognition that is a crucial part of syndrome differentiation. Finally, we conduct experiments to validate the proposed model by comparing with the staked auto-encoder and multi-modal deep learning model for syndrome recognition of hypertension and cold.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it