MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942601404 · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2706

Savanna canopy trees under fire: long‐term persistence and transient dynamics from a stage‐based matrix population model

2019· article· en· W2942601404 on OpenAlex
Patricia A. Werner, Stephanie J. Peacock

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcosphere · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCharles Darwin UniversityAustralian National University
KeywordsUnderstoryPopulationDisturbance (geology)CanopyFire regimeEcologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyVegetation (pathology)Population growthPopulation modelFire ecologyEcosystemBiologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fire is a major disturbance driving the dynamics of the world's savannas. Almost all fires are set by humans who are increasingly altering fire timing and frequency on every continent. The world's largest protected areas of savannas are found in monsoonal northern Australia. These include relatively intact, tall, open forests where traditional indigenous fire regimes have been largely replaced in the past half century by contemporary patterns with trees experiencing fire as often as three out of five years. Eucalypt canopy trees form the basic structure of these savannas and changes to the canopy due to fire regimes cascade to affect other plants and animals. In this study, we used data from nearly three decades of field studies on the effects of fire on individual trees to define eight life‐history stages and to calculate transition rates among stages. We developed a stage‐based matrix population model that explicitly considers how fire season and understory influence growth, survival, and recruitment for each life‐history stage. Long‐term population growth rates and transient population dynamics were calculated under five different fire regimes, each in two understory types, using both deterministic and stochastic simulations of seasonal timing of fires. We found that fire was necessary for long‐term persistence of eucalypt canopy tree populations but, under annual fires, most populations did not survive. Population persistence was highly dependent on fire regime (fire season and frequency) and understory type. A stochastic model tended to yield higher population growth rates than the deterministic model with regular, periodic fires, even under the same long‐term frequency of fires. Transient population dynamics over 100 yr also depended on fire regime and understory, with implications for savanna physiognomy and management. Model predictions were tested in an independent data set from a 21‐yr longitudinal field study in Kakadu National Park. This study is a novel and integrative contribution to our understanding of fire in savanna biomes regarding the potential for long‐term persistence and transient dynamics of savanna canopy tree populations. The model is relatively simple, generalizable, and adaptable for further investigations of the population dynamics of savanna trees under fire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it