Elizabeth Groeneveld, Making Feminist Media: Third-Wave Magazines on the Cusp of the Digital Age
Bibliographic record
Abstract
stamps, blind embossing, embossed printing, hot-foil stamping, offset lithography, and most recently xerographic, laser, and ink jet printing.Each is discussed in detail.This section of the study serves as a brief history of innovation in label printing as it relates to the book trade.The accompanying compact disk contains two catalogues: the first is a descriptive list of 178 bookbinders' signatures.Each ticket is fully described, along with its binding if it remains in situ.Bookcloth is described using Andrea Krupp's Bookcloth in England and America 1823-50 (2008); colours are identified using Centroid Color Charts; and marbled paper is identified using Richard Wolfe's Marbled Paper: Its History, Techniques, and Patterns (University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990).Detailed descriptions include method of printing.Notes that present career dates, bindery addresses, and other pertinent information accompany most entries.The second catalogue describes 615 booksellers' labels.It provides a full description of each label including method of printing.It also provides bibliographic information for the book that accompanies the label, when known, although it does not include a physical description of the book.Together these catalogues add nearly a thousand pages to the study, making this a very robust investigation.An understandable weakness is the relatively small sampling of ninety-two bindings with tickets still in place.Although it is quite a large collection of Canadian tickets, the sample remains too small to draw definitive conclusions about particular binder's tooling habits or their use of materials such as leather, bookcloth, and marbled paper.Combining the study of tickets with booksellers' labels has allowed Garlock to focus not on the work of individual binders but on the use, artistry, and production of tickets and labels -kindred facets of the book trade.An expanded study of British or American tickets and labels along the same lines would be most welcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".