MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942920168

An awfully big adventure! J. M. Barrie's "Peter Pan" im medialen Transfer

2009· article· en· W2942920168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petra Schrackmann, Ingrid Tomkowiak

Bibliographic record

VenueZurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsAdventureArtWhite (mutation)Interpretation (philosophy)Art historyHumanitiesPerformance artNarrativeCharacter (mathematics)LiteratureHistoryPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peter Pan hat sein Publikum schon immer in mehr als einem Medium gefunden. Seinen ersten Auftritt hatte er im Roman «The Little White Bird» (1902) des Schottischen Dramatikers und Romanautors James Matthew Barrie (1860–1937). 1904 liess Barrie den schelmischen Jungen durch das erfolgreiche Theaterstück «Peter Pan or The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up» fliegen, 1911 erzählte er die Geschichte noch einmal in Romanform («Peter and Wendy»). Seit damals durfte Peter seine Abenteuer immer wieder in anderen Medien erleben, in Realspielfilmen, Animationsfilmen und Comics. = Almost from the very beginning, Peter Pan has found his audience in more than one medium: First introduced in a novel for adults, “The Little White Bird” (1902), Scottish playwright and novelist James Matthew Barrie (1860–1937) transferred his most beloved character to the stage in the immensely successful play “Peter Pan or The Boy Who Would Not Grow Up” (1904), which he later retold in the form of a novel (“Peter and Wendy”, 1911). Since then, Peter’s adventures have repeatedly been adapted for various media other than those employed by Barrie.
\nIntroductory parts of this analysis outline the role of the fantastic, discuss the often-cited biographical approach to interpretation and illustrate the development of the literary figure Peter Pan. Following a preliminary interpretation of Barrie’s texts, the focus of this analysis is on seven selected adaptations of “Peter Pan” in the visual media comic book and film. By focusing on key elements of the Peter Pan texts, the author not only examines how the narratives of these adaptations correspond to or differ from their source material but also draws attention to media-specific techniques and how they are used to transfer the story from one medium to another.
\n
\nIst es möglich oder überhaupt wünschenswert, einen literarischen Text eins zu eins in ein anderes Medium zu übertragen? Am Beispiel von sieben ausgewählten Umsetzungen von Barries Werken zeigt die Autorin auf, wie die Geschichte um Peter Pan in anderen Medien neu erzählt wird. Sie hebt dabei wichtige Aspekte der Peter-Pan-Texte hervor und fragt nach Variationen, Übereinstimmungen und Tendenzen der medialen Umsetzungen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)Same topicMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingFrench-language works237,207