MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942931339 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-ems.3

3 CPR by first responders improves acid-base balance and prognosis in out-of-hospital non-traumatic cardiac arrest

2019· article· en· W2942931339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. Hernández-Tejedor, Ervigio Torres Corral, Rawad Elias, Rosa Suárez

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKarolinska InstitutetÖrebro Universitet
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationInternal medicineLogistic regressionOdds ratioEmergency medicineResuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Early basic-CPR has been shown to be effective. However, its effect on homeostasis in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unknown. We analyze pathophysiological and prognostic consequences of basic-CPR performed by first responders (FR) previous to EMS arrival. Method Prospective observational cohort study including all patients treated for OHCA by an EMS from 2015 to 2017. Basic-CPR by FR and venous blood gas by Epocal (Ottawa, Canada) at the beginning of advanced-CPR were covariates. Dependent variables included analytical values and final outcomes (ROSC and final neurological condition CPC grades I–II). Statistical analysis: Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Lilliefors test of normality, bivariate (T-test and Chi-square-test) and multivariate (logistic regression and recursive partitioning) analysis and association measures (odds ratio-OR). Results Our EMS attended 749 OHCA. Eighty-seven cases were excluded due to lack of data on gasometry (52)/FR (35). We analyzed 662 cases (137 women, 65.1±16.1 years-old), 46.1% were shockable rhythms and 63% received basic-CPR. pH was 7.13±0.15 in CPR-by-FR-cases and 7.06±0.18 in non-CPR-by-FR-cases (p<0.001). PvCO2 69±23 vs 77±25 mmHg (p<0.001), base excess −6.6±5.4 vs −8.6±6.6 mmol/L (p<0.001) and lactate 6.4±2.9 vs 7.1±3.3 mmol/L (p=0.008). CPR-by-FR (OR 1.83, CI95% 1.30–2.56, p<0.001) and shockable-rhythm (OR 3.32, CI95% 2.37–4.65, p<0.001) were independently associated with higher pH. ROSC occurred in 62.8% of CPR-by-FR-cases and 54.7% of non-CPR-by-FR-cases; OR 1.40, CI95% 1.02–1.93, p=0.039). Recovery CPC I–II occurred in 27.1% of CPR-by-FR-cases and 19.2% of non-CPR-by-FR-cases; OR 1.57, CI95% 1.06–2.30, p=0.022). Conclusion Basic-CPR by FR slows down metabolic and respiratory acidosis. This entails better outcomes. These data reinforce universal CPR training programs. References Shin J, Lim YS, Kim K, Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Jung E, et al. Initial blood pH during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a multicentre observational registry-based study. Critical Care 2017;21:322. Corral E, Casado MI, García-Ochoa MJ, Suárez R. Looking a ‘metabolic watch’. The analytical parameters found at the beginning of the resuscitation are predictors of the neurological prognostic in the prehospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015;96(Suppl 1);148. Conflict of interest None. Funding None.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207