MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942955007

Review of Daniel P. Scheid, The Cosmic Common Good . Oxford University Press, 2016. 248 pages

2019· article· en· W2942955007 on OpenAlexaff
Jared Call

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreaturesCOSMIC cancer databaseFlooding (psychology)HistoryMeteorologyGeographyEconomic historyPolitical scienceArchaeologyPhysicsAstrophysicsPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Earth was moderately cooler last year, but not by much 1 .2017, additionally, was a year of record-breaking disasters for the United States.These disasters included devastating California wildfires, a trio of hurricanes, hail, flooding, drought, and various tornadoes costing over $200 billion 2 -further fanning the flame over the politically polarizing (and 'heated') debate on "global warming".Despite the minute difference in temperature last year, the last four years are the hottest in recorded history-a period now spanning 138 years.3 Thus, the meticulous and captivating work done by Daniel Scheid in his new book, The Cosmic Common Good, could not be timelier.His cosmo-centric perspective underscores the urgent necessity for an inter-religious collaboration in the development of a common ecological ethics that is mutually beneficialnot only for religious adherents across the world, but also nonhuman creatures and creations that span the cosmos.Daniel Scheid confesses the perspective of Catholicism, specifically Catholicism's social teaching and social thought, to approach social issues regarding an imperilled earth's needs.He creates a suitablenon-anthropocentric-framework that broaches, as well as answers, basic questions of humanity's role on earth and in the cosmos, and the value of nonhuman creatures.He places the ecological crisis in context both globally and locally, accepting that "human products and lifestyle choices could fundamentally alter the patterns of life for nonhuman creatures" (1), and insisting that there is no ethical issue that is more pressing and interconnected in our modern world than climate change.For this reason, Scheid argues that theological traditions have a pivotal role to play in the discussion of climate change that now transcends specialized scientists and spans academic disciplines.For the crisis is not merely a policy failure, an economic conundrum, or our inability to develop more advanced

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)Same topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207