MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942976981 · doi:10.1177/2050313x19845206

Ustekinumab for the treatment of recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum: A case report

2019· article· en· W2942976981 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle A. Vallerand, Jori Hardin

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medical Case Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyoderma gangrenosumMedicineUstekinumabDermatologyImmunosuppressionPyodermaImmunologyDiseasePathologyInfliximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyoderma gangrenosum is an ulcerating disease associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality. Currently, little is known about the pathophysiology of pyoderma gangrenosum, though it has been linked to increased levels of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-23. As pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare disease, evidence for pyoderma gangrenosum treatment is dependent on reporting of cases with successful therapies. Here, we describe a case of pyoderma gangrenosum developing on the lateral leg of a medically complex 47-year-old male already on chronic immunosuppressive therapy, who achieved successful wound healing with the use of ustekinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting inhibition of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23. This case lends further evidence for the role of interleukin-23 in the pathogenesis of recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum and also suggests that healthcare providers may consider a trial of ustekinumab in pyoderma gangrenosum that has failed previous topical treatments or systemic immunosuppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0090.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open Medical Case ReportsSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory DisordersFrench-language works237,207