MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942998847

Transitioning from the Role of Educational Assistant to Classroom Teacher: Experiences of Pre-Service Teachers in a Community-based Bachelor of Education Program

2019· article· en· W2942998847 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patricia Danyluk, Amy Burns, David Scott

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningBachelorPedagogyIdentity (music)Presentation (obstetrics)PsychologyMedical educationMathematics educationMedicinePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation examines the experiences of students in a community-based Bachelor of Education program in western Canada as they transition from their role as Educational Assistants [EA’s] to teachers in remote locations. The Community-based program in this study was designed to address teacher shortages in rural and remote locations. Many of these students enrolled in this program are degree holders and mothers who found themselves volunteering in their children’s classroom and eventually became EA’s. Other students include mothers who always dreamed of becoming a teacher, but were unable to do so because of their remote location. Employing a descriptive phenomenological methodology, the authors examine how, and the extent to which, social positioning and self-identity (Johnson-Bailey 2012) led to transformative learning for students enrolled in this program (Mezirow, 1991; Mezirow, 2003; Mezirow & Taylor, 2009). In this regard, participants describe how their evolving identity as a pre-service teachers impacted their perspectives of self, interactions with school colleagues, family and community members; all the while seeking to balance the multiple demands of family, part-time work and full time study .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0290.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207