Patient-perceived Burden of Disease in Pediatric Relapsing Polychondritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess patient-reported burden of disease in pediatric patients with relapsing polychondritis (RP) and to compare those findings to adult patients. METHODS: A survey based on known clinical symptoms of RP was developed and administered to patients with a pediatric diagnosis of RP. Adult patients completed a similar survey. RESULTS: Twenty-one pediatric patients, or their parents, completed surveys. Median age at symptom onset was 6 years (interquartile range 1.8-12). Prior to diagnosis, most pediatric patients went to the emergency room (ER; 61.9%), saw > 3 physicians (57.1%), and took > 1 year to be diagnosed (61.9%). Pediatric patients were often diagnosed with asthma (42.9%), ear infections (42.9%), or sinusitis (33.3%) prior to diagnosis of RP. Symptoms prior to diagnosis included ear pain/redness (85.7%), joint pain/swelling (61.9%), and airway symptoms (38.1%). Four pediatric patients (19%) reported tracheomalacia requiring tracheostomy. Pediatric patients frequently missed school because of their disease (71.4%). Surveys from 290 adult patients were compared to pediatric patients. Pediatric patients were significantly more likely to undergo biopsy (42.9% vs 17.4%; p < 0.01) and be treated with biologics (42.9% vs 19%; p = 0.02). Adults were significantly more likely to be female (87.8% vs 28.6%; p < 0.01) and to report airway symptoms (77.9% vs 47.6%; p = 0.01). Prevalence of disease complications was not significantly different between adult and pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of disease in pediatric patients with RP includes missed school, diagnostic delay, ER visits, and multisystem disease, with resultant damage to cartilaginous structures. Differences in airway involvement and treatment approaches may exist between pediatric and adult patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".