MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943209628

The Population of the Lower Kwanza Valley, 1792-1796

2018· article· pt· W2943209628 on OpenAlexaff
José C. Curto

Bibliographic record

VenuePonta de Lança: Revista Eletrônica de História, Memória & Cultura · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho baseia-se numa fonte quantitativa pouco explorada, a “Convencao dos Dizimos”. Esta documentacao contem caracteristicas demograficas das populacoes que habitaram o vale do baixo Kwanza em meados da decada de 1790 e foi produzida pouco antes dos recenseamentos nominais e sumarios comecarem a serem feitos nas areas que compunham essa regiao. Compilado entre 1792 e 1796 pelo Capitao Francisco Antonio Pita Bezerra de Alpoim e Castro, esse documento representa um censo regional cuja informacao era para funcionarios coloniais melhorar a extracao de impostos entre as populacoes de Ambaca, Pundo Andongo, Cambambe, Massangano, Muxima e Calumbo. Esses territorios formavam um corredor atraves do qual anualmente passavam milhares de cativos destinados em grande parte para as Americas, especialmente o Brasil. Oferecendo o mais antigo perfil do tamanho, genero, grupos etarios e distribuicao geografica das populacoes que habitavam os territorios supracitados, a “Convencao dos Dizimos” nao so permite obter uma melhor compreensao da producao de dados demograficos na Angola colonial, como tambem possibilita um refinamento, se nao a correcao, de certas nocoes relativas ao impacto do comercio de escravos no Atlântico.Palavras-Chaves: historia demografica, Angola, recenseamentos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePonta de Lança: Revista Eletrônica de História, Memória & CulturaSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207