MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943471727 · doi:10.1149/ma2019-03/1/19

(Invited) Atomically-Precise Interfacial Materials and Design of Solid-State Batteries

2019· article· en· W2943471727 on OpenAlexaff
Andy Xueliang Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteMaterials scienceAnodeCathodeAtomic layer depositionElectrodeNanotechnologyLithium (medication)ElectrochemistryEnergy storageConformal coatingCoatingLayer (electronics)Deposition (geology)Chemical engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state-of the-art rechargeable Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) use liquid electrolytes and are the major choice for current EVs and portable electronic applications. However, these LIBs still suffer from many issues related to safety, lifespan and energy density. Accordingly, solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) have recently emerged as a promising alternative energy storage device due to their ability to overcome the intrinsic disadvantages of liquid-electrolyte LIBs and possess a greater volumetric energy density due to the use of solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). However, the interfacial issues between SSEs and electrodes (both cathode and anode) have a significant impact on the stability and lifetime of SSLBs [1-2]. The origin of these interfacial phenomena is the unstable contact and chemical reactions between electrodes and electrolytes to form an interlayer with extremely low electronic and/or ionic conductivities, which restricts the performance of the SSLBs. An artificial, uniform and ultrathin interfacial layer is critical to address these challenges [2]. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) and molecular layer deposition (MLD) are unique coating techniques that can realize excellent coverage and conformal deposition with precisely controllable at the nanoscale level due to its self-limiting nature, which are ideal for addressing the challenges of interface in SSLBs [2]. Our work applys ALD/MLD to rationally design novel coatings to address the interfacial challenges in SSLBs. The goal is to prevent capacity degradation of SSLBs caused by high interfacial resistance and chemical/electrochemical reactions between electrodes and electrolytes. We will demonstrate to (i) stabilize the interface between cathode electrodes and electrolytes and prevent the formation of intrinsically high resistance layers, (ii) suppress elemental inter-diffusion during the operation of SSLBs, (iii) fabricate facile ionic transportation channels to facilitate ion exchange between different components of SSLBs, and (iv) buffer volume changes during cycling of SSLBs. References: 1. Y. Zhao, X. Sun. Molecular Layer Deposition Technique for Energy Conversion and Storage. ACS Energy Lett. (2018),3,899-914. 2. Y. Zhao, X. Sun .Addressing Interfacial Issues in Liquid-based and Solid-State Batteries by Atomic and Molecular Layer Deposition. Joule.2018, in press. 3. Y. Zhao, X. Sun, et al., Robust Metallic Lithium Anode Protected by Molecular Layer Deposition Technique, Small Methods, (2018),1700417. DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201700417 4. C. Wang, X. Sun, et al., Stabilizing interface between Li10SnP2S12 and Li metal by molecular layer deposition. Nano Energy.53 (2018) 168–174. 5. C. Wang, X. Sun, et al., Boosting the performance of lithium batteries with solid-liquid hybrid electrolytes: Interfacial properties and effects of liquid electrolytes. Nano Energy.48 (2018) 35-43. 6. J. Liang, X. Sun, et al., In-Situ Li3PS4 Solid-State Electrolyte Protection Layers for Superior Long Life and High Rate Li-Metal Anodes. Adv. Mater. 2018, in press. 7. X. Li, X. Sun, et al., High-performance all-solid-state Li–Se batteries induced by sulfide electrolytes, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018,DOI: 10.1039/C8EE01621F.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207