Dietary methionine restriction targets one carbon metabolism in humans and produces broad therapeutic responses in cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nutrition exerts profound effects on health and dietary interventions are commonly used to treat diseases of metabolic etiology. Although cancer has a substantial metabolic component, the principles that define whether nutrition may be used to influence tumour outcome are unclear. Nevertheless, it is established that targeting metabolic pathways with pharmacological agents or radiation can sometimes lead to controlled therapeutic outcomes. In contrast, whether specific dietary interventions could influence the metabolic pathways that are targeted in standard cancer therapies is not known. We now show that dietary restriction of methionine (MR), an essential amino acid, and the reduction of which has aging and obesogenic properties, influences cancer outcome through controlled and reproducible changes to one carbon metabolism. This pathway metabolizes methionine and further is the target of a host of cancer interventions involving chemotherapy and radiation. MR produced therapeutic responses in chemoresistant RAS-driven colorectal cancer patient derived xenografts and autochthonous KRAS G12D +/− ; TP53 −/− -driven soft tissue sarcomas resistant to radiation. Metabolomics revealed the therapeutic mechanisms to occur through tumor cell autonomous effects on the flux through one carbon metabolism that impacted redox and nucleotide metabolism, thus interacting with the antimetabolite or radiation intervention. Finally, in a controlled and tolerated feeding study in humans, MR resulted in similar effects on systemic metabolism as obtained in responsive mice. These findings provide evidence that a targeted dietary manipulation can affect specific tumor cell metabolism to mediate broad aspects of cancer outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".