MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943628666 · doi:10.1364/oe.27.014353

Self-steering partially coherent vector beams

2019· article· en· W2943628666 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Haidan Mao, Yahong Chen, Chunhao Liang, Linfei Chen, Yangjian Cai, Sergey A. Ponomarenko

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHangzhou Dianzi UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPolarization (electrochemistry)PhysicsOpticsBeam steeringGaussianLinear polarizationCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Light beamBeam (structure)ExcitationDegree of polarizationLaserScatteringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a class of self-steering partially coherent vector optical beams with the aid of a generalized complex Gaussian representation. We show that such partially coherent vector beams have mobile guiding centers of their intensity and polarization state distributions on the beam free space propagation that could be employed to generate far-field polarization arrays. Further, we introduce theoretically and realize experimentally a class of vector beams with inhomogeneous statistical and nontrivial far-field angular distributions, which we term cylindrically correlated partially coherent (CCPC) vector beams. We find that such novel beams possess, in general, cylindrically polarized, far-field patterns of an adjustable degree of polarization. The steering control of the intensity and polarization of the self-steering CCPC vector beam is also demonstrated in experiment. Our findings can find important applications, such as trapping of neutral microparticles and excitation of novel surface waves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207