MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943702730 · doi:10.1007/s12035-019-1612-4

NETO1 Regulates Postsynaptic Kainate Receptors in CA3 Interneurons During Circuit Maturation

2019· article· en· W2943702730 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ester Orav, Ilona Dowavic, Johanna Huupponen, Tomi Taira, Sari E. Lauri

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Neurobiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöJane ja Aatos Erkon SäätiöAcademy of FinlandBiotieteiden ja Ympäristön Tutkimuksen ToimikuntaMcGill UniversityHelsingin Yliopisto
KeywordsKainate receptorNeuroscienceGABAergicInterneuronBiologyAMPA receptorPostsynaptic potentialGlutamatergicIonotropic effectNeurotransmissionGlutamate receptorInhibitory postsynaptic potentialReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kainate type ionotropic glutamate receptors (KARs) are expressed in hippocampal interneurons and regulate interneuron excitability and GABAergic transmission. Neuropilin tolloid-like proteins (NETO1 and NETO2) act as KAR auxiliary subunits; however, their significance for various functions of KARs in GABAergic interneurons is not fully understood. Here we show that NETO1, but not NETO2, is necessary for dendritic delivery of KAR subunits and, consequently, for formation of KAR-containing synapses in cultured GABAergic neurons. Accordingly, electrophysiological analysis of neonatal CA3 stratum radiatum interneurons revealed impaired postsynaptic and metabotropic KAR signaling in Neto1 knockouts, while a subpopulation of ionotropic KARs in the somatodendritic compartment remained functional. Loss of NETO1/KAR signaling had no significant effect on development of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor-mediated glutamatergic transmission in CA3 interneurons, contrasting the synaptogenic role proposed for KARs in principal cells. Furthermore, loss of NETO1 had no effect on excitability and characteristic spontaneous network bursts in the immature CA3 circuitry. However, we find that NETO1 is critical for kainate-dependent modulation of network bursts and GABAergic transmission in the hippocampus already during the first week of life. Our results provide the first description of NETO1-dependent subcellular targeting of KAR subunits in GABAergic neurons and indicate that endogenous NETO1 is required for formation of KAR-containing synapses in interneurons. Since aberrant KAR-mediated excitability is implicated in certain forms of epilepsy, NETO1 represents a potential therapeutic target for treatment of both adult and early life seizures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular NeurobiologySame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207