MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943872985

Neptec 3D Laser Camera System: from space mission STS-105 to terrestrial applications

2002· article· en· W2943872985 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Samson, Chad English, Adam Deslauriers, I. Christie, F. Blais, Frank P. Ferrie

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingComputer graphics (images)Space (punctuation)AstrobiologyComputer scienceComputer visionGeologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neptec Design Group has developed the Laser Camera System (LCS), a 3D autosynchronized laser scanner based on a principle originating from the National Research Council of Canada. In imaging mode, the LCS raster scans objects and captures reflections from their surface features. In centroid acquisition mode, the LCS determines the position of discrete target points on an object. Neptec Design Group first developed the LCS for space applications. In August 2001, theLCS flew successfully onboard space shuttle Discovery during mission STS-105 to theInternational Space Station (ISS). During the mission, the LCS took four high-resolution(1024x1024 voxels) images of elements of the ISS during orbital day and night, demonstrating its immunity to dynamic lighting conditions. The LCS also tracked targets affixed to the Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) while in motion, more than 10 m away. Comparison with Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) data confirmed that the LCS tracked these targets with millimetre precision. Following the mission, the LCS has been demonstrated in a variety of terrestrial commercial applications. Two examples from the earth sciences include imaging rock faces in an underground mine to delineate joints to design adequate tunnel support, and acquiring detailed images of sandstone masonry walls. The high-fidelity spatial information and the intensity data captured by the LCS concurrently make it a valuable tool for the classification of geomaterials based on reflectivity and texture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)Same topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207