The efficacy of the Hiline gas permeable contact lens for the management of Keratoconus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of the Hiline® gas permeable contact lens (Hiline® GP) for keratoconus in clinical practice in correcting visual acuity. Methods: 218 eyes of 126 patients with keratoconus were fitted with Hiline® lenses. The fit of the lenses was evaluated. Visual acuity measurements were taken with spectacle lenses and with the Hiline lenses. The period of follow-up to observe for complications ranged from 3 to 27 months. Results: In all eyes, the Hiline® GP provided acceptable vision. There was a statistically significant improvement in vision with the Hiline® GP compared with spectacle lenses (t=10.90, p<0.0001). Initial evaluation showed that 169 lenses (77.52%) demonstrated a three-pointtouch relationship with the cornea 38 lenses (17.43%) had an apical clearance relationship with the cornea and 11 lenses (5.05%) had an apical bearing relationship. No severe complications were observed. Conclusions: Using corneal topography as a guide, a high success rate was achieved with the Hiline® GP design. It is easy to reach the ideal fit and to improve the visual acuity. These indicate the usefulness of Hiline® lens in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".