MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943969851 · doi:10.5539/jmr.v11n3p14

On Liouvillian Solutions of Third Order Homogeneous Linear Differential Equations

2019· article· en· W2943969851 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noura Okko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematics Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHomogeneousExponentInvariant (physics)CombinatoricsLogarithmExponential functionDifferential equationConstant (computer programming)Mathematical physicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we will consider third order homogeneous differential equations: L(y)=y'''+a_1y'+a_0y(a_0,a_1 ∈k) whose Galois group G(L) is imprimitive. This case is characterised by the fact that the third symmetric power equation L ^ⓢ3(y)=0 has an exponential solution whose square is rational (Singer & Ulmer 1993). If L(y)=0 has a Liouvillian solution z whose logarithmic derivative u=z'/z is algebraic over a differential field (k,') ,we will give an algorithm to find the relation between a_0, a_1 , the semi-invariant S=Y_1Y_2Y_3 which is unique up to multiplication by a constant, the coefficients C_0, C_1 of the minimal polynomial P(u) of u and their derivatives. The aim of this work is to diminutize the number of constants C_m stated in the algorithm of Singer & Ulmer (Singer & Ulmer 1993 Algorithm p. 31) whose determination is not easy to do, and we will achieve this by using Groebner Basis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematics ResearchSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207