MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2944063504 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz006.175

A176 IMPROVEMENT IN NUTRITION STATUS IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOWER RATES OF INFECTION AND HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

2019· article· en· W2944063504 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elaine Chiu, Lloyd M. Taylor, Louisa Lam, Karen Marr, Melanie Stapleton, Quinn Fitzgerald, Puneeta Tandon, Maitreyi Raman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCirrhosisHepatic encephalopathyProspective cohort studyInternal medicineMalnutritionCohortLiver diseaseClinical nutritionModel for End-Stage Liver DiseasePhysical therapyPediatricsLiver transplantationTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malnutrition is highly prevalent in cirrhosis and an independent predictor of negative clinical outcomes such as hospitalizations, infections, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), GI bleeding and mortality. Ambulatory nutrition interventions in cirrhosis and their effects on clinical outcomes have been under-explored. The study aim was to identify if a personalized nutrition intervention in malnourished pre-transplant patients with cirrhosis impacted clinical outcomes at 6–12 months. A prospective cohort study was conducted from 2014–2017 at the University of Calgary malnutrition clinic. Participants were assessed by a registered dietitian and a physician nutrition specialist and completed measurement of subjective global assessment (SGA), handgrip strength (HGS) and mid arm circumference (MAC). Patients identified as malnourished received tailored nutrition intervention. Clinical outcomes on frequency of hospitalizations, infections, HE and mortality were collected 6–12 months following intervention. T-tests, chi-squared analyses and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to examine relationships between nutrition assessment measures and outcomes. This study included 43 patients and 53.1%(n=25) were male. Compared to baseline, at 6–12 months there was a significant increase in BMI, improvements in HGS and MAC category, and more patients in a lower MELD-Na category, reflecting less severe disease (Table 1). Clinically, SGA classification improved, but this did not reach statistical significance. Patients whose SGA improved had a greater improvement in MELD-Na compared to those whose SGA worsened or was maintained (F(2)=6.95, p<0.05). Worsening SGA at follow up was associated with increased infections and HE (Chi2(1) =7.93, p<0.01; Chi2(2) =5.82, p=0.05, respectively). Fewer hospitalizations were potentially observed in patients with improved SGA status (p=0.11) and MAC (p=0.13), but this was not statistically significant. No other associations were found between HGS or MAC changes and clinical outcomes at follow-up compared to baseline. Improvement in SGA status appears to be associated with fewer infections and lower frequency of HE at 6–12 months. Nutrition assessment and intervention may benefit clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. Table 1. Characteristics at baseline and 6–12 month follow up None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→