MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944064481 · doi:10.1002/adsc.201900467

Iron and Nitrogen Co‐Doped Mesoporous Carbon‐Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for Selective Reduction of Nitroarenes

2019· article· en· W2944064481 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ji‐Tao Wang, Xiaochun Yu, Chong‐Yang Shi, Dajie Lin, Jun Li, Huile Jin, Xi’an Chen, Shun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Synthesis & Catalysis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicNanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsChemistrySelectivityCatalysisInorganic chemistryCalcinationMesoporous materialSelective reductionNitrobenzeneArsenateAzoxyHydrothermal synthesisHydrothermal circulationOrganic chemistryChemical engineeringArsenic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A facile fabrication of Fe and N co‐doped mesoporous carbon (MC), as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the highly selective reduction of nitroarenes, is described. The Fe and N co‐doped MC nanosheets are easily synthesized via a hydrothermal reaction between citrate acid and magnesium citrate, followed by calcination in the presence of melamine and potassium ferrocyanide. The Fe−N complex provides a unique active site for the selective reduction of 1‐chloro‐4‐nitrobenzene, leading to the production of (E)‐1,2‐bis(4‐chlorophenyl)diazene with a selectivity of >96%, in <40 mins. Control experiments based on non‐doped, N‐doped, and Fe‐doped MC nanosheets demonstrate that selectivity greatly depends on the catalyst active component type, and that non‐doped MC significantly contributes to the high efficiencies observed in the selective synthesis of azoxy compound intermediates. A broad range of substrates, including extra‐functional groups on the nitroarenes rings, were successfully converted to the corresponding azo compounds at mild conditions with high selectivity. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Synthesis & CatalysisSame topicNanomaterials for catalytic reactionsFrench-language works237,207