MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944065620 · doi:10.5006/3152

The Effects of Chloride Droplet Properties on the Underoil Corrosion of API X100 Pipeline Steel

2019· article· en· W2944065620 on OpenAlexaff
Hongxing Liang, Rebecca Schaller, Edouard Asselin

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionChloridePipeline (software)Materials scienceMetallurgyEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The corrosive environment expected to form in diluted bitumen pipelines was explored by simulated exposure with a paraffin oil-covered chloride droplet on API X100 pipeline steel. The effects of droplet volume, chloride ion concentration, temperature, initial pH, and cation species on the underoil droplet corrosion behavior of API X100 pipeline steel were studied by corrosion morphology and product identification combined with corrosion penetration measurements. The corrosion rate in the active region beneath the oil-covered sodium chloride droplets was inversely proportional to droplet volume but increased with increasing temperature and chloride ion concentration. Corrosion attack morphology was found to be dependent on initial droplet pH. At pH 2, uniform corrosion occurred across the entire area exposed under the oil-covered droplet. The oil-covered sodium chloride droplets with initial pH of 4 accelerated the uniform corrosion when compared to the droplet without initial pH control (pH ∼ 5.5). However, at a high initial pH of 10, two active regions displaying different general corrosion rates and one inactive region were observed under the oil-covered droplet. At an even higher initial pH of 12, no obvious uniform corrosion was observed beneath the oil-covered droplet. Finally, in the exposures to droplets with varied cation, the uniform corrosion in the active region was reduced by either calcium or magnesium ions in the oil-covered droplet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCORROSIONSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207