Effects of pre-lay dietary calcium (2.5 vs. 4.0%) and pullet strain (Lohmann Brown vs. Selected Leghorn LSL-Lite) on calcium utilization and femur quality at 1st through to the 50th egg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study the effects of pre-lay dietary Ca and strain on Ca utilization and femur quality at 1st through to 50th egg, 30 Lohmann Brown (LB) and 30 Lohmann Selected Leghorn-Lite (LSL) pullets (14 weeks of age, woa) reared under same management regimen were used. Six pullets/strain were necropsied for baseline femur samples and the rest (24 pullets/strain) placed in individual cages (65 × 30 × 45 cm3) and fed 1% Ca developer diet for 2 wk. At 16 woa, all pullets were weighed and allocated within strains to pre-lay diets (2.5 vs. 4.0% Ca) effectively creating a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The pullets were offered pre-lay diets for 2 wk and switched to 4% Ca diet at 18 woa. The diets contained TiO2 to determine apparent retention (AR) of Ca. The age, BW, and feed intake (FI) at 1st, 25th, and 50th egg were recorded. Excreta samples were taken during pre-lay, at 1st and 25th egg and 4 hens per treatment were necropsied for femur samples at 1st, 25th, and 50th egg. There was no interaction (P > 0.05) between pre-lay Ca and strain on Ca intake, femur mineral density (FMD), mineral content (FMC), breaking strength (FBS), and ash (FA) content at 1st, 25th, and 50th egg. At 1st egg, pre-lay Ca interacted with strain on AR of Ca (P = 0.014) such that LB hens retained more Ca at 2.5 vs. 4.0% Ca or LSL at 2.5% Ca. Pre-lay Ca had no effect (P > 0.05) on FMD, FMC, FBS, and FA at 1st, 25th, and 50th egg lay. Compared with LB hens, LSL hens had higher FMD (0.30 vs. 0.19 g/cm2; P = 0.010) and FA (51.9 vs. 42.5%; P < 0.01) at 1st egg and FBS (259.4 vs. 173.8 N, P < 0.01) at 25th egg. In conclusion, except at 25th egg, pre-lay Ca and strain had independent effect on Ca utilization. Femur attributes to 1st egg suggested innate need for LSL birds to accumulate critical bone mass prior to first oviposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".