MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

N‐end‐rule‐mediated Degradation of the Proteolytically Activated Form of PKC‐theta Kinase attenuates its Pro‐Apoptotic Function

2016· article· en· W2944149735 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mohamed A. Eldeeb, Mansoore Esmaili, Richard P. Fahlman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurkat cellsProtein kinase CStaurosporineCell biologyApoptosisProteolysisBiologyProgrammed cell deathMolecular biologyChemistryKinaseBiochemistryT cellGeneticsEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular stresses and signalling that lead to the initiation of apoptotic pathways often result in the activation of caspases or calpains which in turn leads to the generation of proteolytically generated protein fragments with new or altered functions. Mounting number of studies reveal that the activity of these proteolytically activated protein fragments can be counteracted via their selective degradation by the N‐End Rule pathway. Here we investigate the proteolytically generated fragment of the PKC theta kinase, where we report the first study on the stability of this pro‐apoptotic protein fragment. We have determined that the pro‐apoptotic cleaved fragment of PKC‐theta is unstable in cells as its N‐terminal lysine targets it for proteasomal degradation via the N‐end rule pathway and this degradation is inhibited by mutating the destabilizing N‐Termini, knockdown of the UBR1 and UBR2 E3 ligases. Tellingly, we demonstrate that the metabolic stabilization of the cleaved fragment of PKC‐theta or inhibition of the N‐end rule augments the apoptosis‐inducing effect of staurosporine in Jurkat cells. Notably, we have demonstrated that the cleaved fragment of PKC theta, per se , can induce apoptotic cell death in Jurkat T‐cell leukemia. Our results expand the functional scope of N‐end rule pathway and support the notion that targeting N‐end rule machinery may have therapeutic implications. Support or Funding Information Mohamed Eldeeb is supported by Alberta‐Innovates Technology Futures (AITF) scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCell death mechanisms and regulation→French-language works237,207→