2D Solitons in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>-Symmetric Photonic Lattices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last few years, parity-time (PT) symmetry has been the focus of considerable attention. Ever since, pseudo-Hermitian notions have permeated a number of fields ranging from optics to atomic and topological physics, as well as optomechanics, to mention a few. Unlike their Hermitian counterparts, nonconservative systems do not exhibit a priori real eigenvalues and hence unitary evolution. However, once PT symmetry is introduced, such dissipative systems can surprisingly display a real eigenspectrum, thus ensuring energy conservation during evolution. In optics, PT symmetry can be readily established by incorporating, in a balanced way, regions having an equal amount of optical gain and loss. However, thus far, all optical realizations of such PT symmetry have been restricted to a single transverse dimension (1D), such as arrays of optical waveguides or active coupled cavity arrangements. In most cases, only the loss function was modulated-a restrictive aspect that is only appropriate for linear systems. Here, we present an experimental platform for investigating the interplay between PT symmetry and nonlinearity in two-dimensional (2D) environments, where nonlinear localization and soliton formation can be observed. In contrast to typical dissipative solitons, we demonstrate a one-parameter family of soliton solutions that are capable of displaying attributes similar to those encountered in nonlinear conservative arrangements. For high optical powers, this new family of PT solitons tends to collapse on a discrete network-thus giving rise to an amplified, self-accelerating structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".