MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944193784 · doi:10.1111/scs.12698

‘The self‐destruction force is so strong’: male survivors’ experience of suicidal thoughts following sexual violence

2019· article· en· W2944193784 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elisa Drofn V. Tryggvadottir, Sigrún Sigurðardóttir, Sigríður Halldórsdóttir

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHáskólinn á Akureyri
KeywordsShameLonelinessPsychologyMasculinityPsychological painClinical psychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suicidal thoughts are common among male sexual violence survivors. However, very few studies have focused specifically on this aspect. The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of male survivors themselves of suicidal thoughts following sexual violence within the framework of men and masculinity. The research methodology was The Vancouver School of Doing Phenomenology, and a total of 17 interviews were conducted with seven male survivors. The main findings of the study are that the source of the suicidal thoughts after sexual violence is based on an experienced strong self-destruction force that involves almost unbearable and unexpressed suffering. The strong self-destruction force appeared among other things in risk behaviour and negligence towards own life and health. Participants all agreed that the thought of suicide was a certain escape route, that is to be constantly trying to escape from oneself and inner suffering. Negative thoughts that were difficult to suppress developed into suicidal thoughts that developed into thinking about the best possible way to commit suicide. Shattered self-esteem, shame and loneliness characterised the lives of participants, and they felt disgusting and worthless as human beings. Much self-degradation was characteristic. Perceived common societal norms about male masculinity had major negative impact on participants, for example that they should not show emotions because they were men and therefore should not express emotional pain or disclose their traumas. This resulted in emotional silencing. Disclosing the violence proved extremely difficult for all participants, but they experienced a high level of positive energy following disclosure. Participants experienced lack of knowledge, understanding and appropriate support from healthcare professionals and felt that sexual violence survivors' trauma history needed to be better explored within health care. It is important that professionals acquire knowledge and understanding of male sexual violence survivors, and their suicidal thoughts, and become able to provide trauma-specific support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Caring SciencesSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207