TractoFlow: A robust, efficient and reproducible diffusion MRI pipeline leveraging Nextflow & Singularity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A diffusion MRI (dMRI) tractography processing pipeline should be: i) reproducible in immediate test-test, ii) reproducible in time, iii) efficient and iv) easy to use. Two runs of the same processing pipeline with the same input data should give the same output today, tomorrow and in 2 years. However, processing dMRI data requires a large number of steps (20+ steps) that, at this time, may not be reproducible between runs or over time. If parameters such as the number of threads or the random number generator are not carefully set in the brain extraction, registration and fiber tracking steps, the end tractography results obtained can be far from reproducible and limit brain connectivity studies. Moreover, processing can take several hours to days of computation for a large database, even more so if the steps are running sequentially. To handle these issues, we present TractoFlow , a fully automated pipeline that processes datasets from the raw diffusion weighted images (DWI) to tractography. It also outputs classical diffusion tensor imaging measures (fractional anisotropy (FA) and diffu-sivities) and several HARDI measures (Number of Fiber Orientation (NuFO), Apparent Fiber Density (AFD)). The pipeline requires a DWI and T1-weighted image as NIfTI files and b-values/b-vectors in FSL format. An optional reversed phase encoded b=0 image can also be used. This pipeline is based on two technologies: Nextflow and Singularity , as well as recommended pre-processing and processing steps from the dMRI community. In this work, the TractoFlow pipeline is evaluated on three databases and shown to be efficient and reproducible from 98% to 100% depending on parameter choices. For example, 105 subjects from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) were fully ran in twenty-five (25) hours to produce, for each subject, a whole-brain tractogram with 4 million streamlines. The contribution of this paper is to introduce the importance of a robust pipeline in terms of runtime and reproducibility over time. In the era of open data and open science, efficiency and reproducibility is critical in neuroimaging projects. Our TractoFlow pipeline is publicly available for academic research and is an important step forward for better structural brain connectivity mapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".