Sistema de remuneração dos hospitais privados no Brasil: problemas e propostas de soluções
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A tese trata do sistema de remuneracao dos hospitais privados no Brasil, setor que representa parcela consideravel da oferta dos servicos de saude no Brasil, materializando o acesso do cidadao ao seu direito a saude. O setor tem sofrido perdas financeiras e vem acumulando prejuizos em razao das politicas remuneratorias tanto dos gestores do SUS, como das operadoras, ameacando a viabilidade do empreendimento e consequentemente, o atendimento ao cidadao. A pesquisa objetivou apontar medidas para a solucao dos problemas causados pelo sistema de remuneracao hospitalar (riscos de destruicao de parte dos hospitais, em particular, dos menores, aumento da tensao entre operadoras e prestadores de servicos) que indiretamente prejudicam o cidadao. A metodologia consistiu na analise documental e pesquisa sobre experiencias estrangeiras na constituicao e gestao dos sistemas de remuneracao dos hospitais. A primeira parte do trabalho trata do sistema de saude e o enquadramento da organizacao hospitalar no respectivo sistema. A segunda aborda o sistema de remuneracao hospitalar, comparando as praticas e sistemas adotados na Franca, Japao, Espanha, Reino Unido, Estados Unidos, Australia e Canada. A terceira analisa a remuneracao do setor hospitalar privado no Brasil, cuja constituicao compreende a relacao com o SUS, as operadoras e a Agencia Nacional de Saude Suplementar - ANS. A quarta parte apresenta as perspectivas remuneratorias do setor e apresentando proposta do autor. Por resultado a pesquisa mostrou que as acoes necessarias a solucao do problema respeitam ao governo federal (revisao da tabela de precos pagos aos prestadores, simplificacao do aparato legal e regulatorio e maior controle sobre as decisoes da ANS) e as organizacoes hospitalares quanto a adocao de estrategias e praticas voltadas a eficacia e transparencia da gestao
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".