MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944368071 · doi:10.1002/mp.13565

Technical Note: Sensitive volume effects on ion chamber responses in longitudinal magnetic fields

2019· article· en· W2944368071 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Reynolds, S Rathee, B. G. Fallone

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Innovates
KeywordsMagnetic fieldIonization chamberVolume (thermodynamics)Nuclear magnetic resonancePhysicsIonNuclear medicineComputational physicsAtomic physicsIonizationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: It has been shown that ion chamber dose response Monte Carlo simulations, in transverse magnetic fields, are susceptible to small changes in the scored sensitive volume. Changes in sensitive volumes have been investigated as a surrogate for modeling the true collection volume governed by the electric field. This work has not been fully extended to longitudinal fields. This study investigates the effect of the sensitive volume of ion chambers on magnetic field dose response within longitudinal magnetic fields. METHODS: The egs_chamber application within EGSnrc was used to model the Exradin A19, A28, and A1SL ion chambers within a uniform longitudinal magnetic field. The sensitive volume of the ion chambers was varied by removing portions of the air volume (from 0.2 to 3 mm) closest to the chamber stem from the dose scoring region; the dose to the scoring volume as a function of magnetic fields strength was normalized to 0 T in all cases. RESULTS: With the chamber long axis oriented parallel to the radiation and magnetic fields, for every magnetic field strength, all investigated chambers' dose response remained inside statistical variations for all investigated chamber sensitive volumes. When the chamber long axis is oriented perpendicular to the radiation and magnetic fields, the A28 and A1SL show negligible sensitive volume effects, while the A19 under responded by 0.5% for the largest removed volume of 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: When the ion chambers' long axis is parallel to the radiation and magnetic fields, the magnetic field dose response is unaffected by small changes in sensitive volume. When oriented perpendicularly, only the A19 exhibits sensitive volume based magnetic field dose response changes, and only with ≥ 1 mm of assumed insensitive volume. We can therefore safely assume complete charge collection in Monte Carlo calculated correction factors involving similar chambers in similar conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207