MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944516232 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f66

Confirmation of the Gaia DR2 Parallax Zero-point Offset Using Asteroseismology and Spectroscopy in the Kepler Field

2019· article· en· W2944516232 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryKavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa BarbaraUniversity of Colorado BoulderOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikNuclear Safety and Security CommissionUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityNational Science FoundationU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale University
KeywordsParallaxAsteroseismologyStarsRed giantOffset (computer science)Red clumpSpectroscopyRed-giant branch

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present an independent confirmation of the zero-point offset of Gaia Data Release 2 parallaxes using asteroseismic data of evolved stars in the Kepler field. Using well-characterized red giant branch stars from the APOKASC-2 catalog, we identify a Gaia astrometric pseudocolor ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>eff</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> )- and Gaia G -band magnitude-dependent zero-point offset of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ϖ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>seis</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> − <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ϖ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Gaia</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> = 52.8 ± 2.4 (rand.) ± 8.6 (syst.) − (150.7 ± 22.7)( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ν</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>eff</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> − 1.5) − (4.21 ± 0.77)( G − 12.2) μ as, in the sense that Gaia parallaxes are too small. The offset is found in high- and low-extinction samples, as well as among both shell H-burning red giant stars and core He-burning red clump stars. We show that errors in the asteroseismic radius and temperature scales may be distinguished from errors in the Gaia parallax scale. We estimate systematic effects on the inferred global Gaia parallax offset, c , due to radius and temperature systematics, as well as choices in bolometric correction and the adopted form for Gaia parallax spatial correlations. Because of possible spatially correlated parallax errors, as discussed by the Gaia team, our Gaia parallax offset model is specific to the Kepler field, but broadly compatible with the magnitude- and color-dependent offset inferred by the Gaia team and several subsequent investigations using independent methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations168
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207