MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944569490 · doi:10.15353/cjo.78.461

Negotiating the Operating Costs as Rent

2016· article· en· W2944569490 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeff Grandfield, Dale Willerton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationBusinessEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

R eaders of our new book, Negotiating Commercial Leases & Renewals FOR DUMMIES, will learn (in-part) that although most commercial real estate professionals may tell you that operating costs are not negotiable, there are aspects of these costs that can indeed be changed to the tenant's favour.When it comes to operating costs (also known as Common Area Maintenance / CAM charges), the landlord wants to make sure that the tenants pay all these costs for the building.There's nothing unusual about that.However, when The Lease Coach analyzes operating costs for groups of tenants in a building, we often find that the tenants are subsidizing capital improvements that the landlord is using to enhance or increase the building and/or property's total value.If a formal lease document uses sufficient detail to define what constitutes an operating cost, then the tenant has a fighting chance to at least examine, question, and negotiate each listed item.We remember one Florida landlord who charged all of his tenants an annual fee to have a pool of money available for hurricane damage not fully covered by insurance.With being skeptical about this claim, we inspected closer and noticed there was no end to this billing or reserve fund … tenants were required to pay it for the entire duration of their tenancy.If a tenant moved out at the end of their lease term, they did not receive any of the money back they had paid -even if there had been no hurricane damage.In this case, this landlord was simply creating a slush fund to do with as he pleased.With that said, look for odd clauses in your formal lease document and scrutinize them carefully -after all, it's your money!Look at what you're paying for.The majority of commercial, office, and retail lease agreements may stipulate that the specific components of the operating costs that the tenants need to pay for.Typical examples of operating costs include general property maintenance, painting, lawn cutting, snow removal, property insurance, and so on.Remember, a valid operating cost is one

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0170.015
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207