MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944598295 · doi:10.1210/js.2019-sat-063

SAT-063 Peripheral Aldosterone Values During Simultaneous Bilateral Adrenal Veins Sampling (AVS) to Predict the Source of Aldosterone Secretion in Primary Aldosteronism (PA)

2019· article· en· W2944598295 on OpenAlexaff
Matthieu St‐Jean, Isabelle Bourdeau, Éric Thérasse, André Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAldosteroneInternal medicineEndocrinologyBasal (medicine)Primary aldosteronismAdrenocorticotropic hormoneChemistryMedicineAdrenal adenomaAdenomaHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: AVS identifies aldosterone source in PA from unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) or bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH). APA and BAH can overexpress ACTH receptors, but their variable levels may explain discordant lateralization results between basal and post ACTH values (1,2). Previous studies suggested that differential response of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) to ACTH stimulation could predict the subtypes of PA (3). Objective: Assess the usefulness of peripheral (P) vein PAC response to ACTH to differentiate the source of excess aldosterone in patients with PA. Methods: In 215 bilaterally selective simultaneous AVS, PAC and plasma cortisol (C) were measured basally (-5 , 0 min,) and 5, 10, 15 min following ACTH 250 mcg IV bolus in adrenal and P veins; samples were also measured in P at 30, 45 and 60 min. Patients were assigned to four different lateralization ratio (LR) groups: group 1 (n= 140) lateralized source (basal LR ≥ 2 and post-ACTH LR ≥ 4), group 2 (n= 38) basal lateralization only (basal LR ≥ 2 and post-ACTH < 4), group 3 (n=10) post ACTH lateralization only (basal LR < 2 and post-ACTH ≥ 4) and group 4 (n= 27) bilateral source (basal LR < 2 and post-ACTH < 4. The P vein parameters included: mean basal PAC, maximal PAC (PACmax) and maximal PAC/C ratio (PACmax/C) following ACTH bolus, PAC absolute increase, PAC relative increase, maximal absolute variation of PAC/C ratio between post-ACTH and basal measures. Results: Mean basal PAC in P was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 or 4 (p < 0.001). PACmax, PACmax/C and PAC absolute increase following ACTH bolus were higher in group 1 than the others (p < 0.017). Group 4 had higher PAC relative increase following ACTH bolus than group 1 (p: 0.0097). ROC curves analysis for these parameters were performed by comparing group 1 with the others. Best AUC were obtained with mean basal PAC (AUC: 0.7386 95% IC: 0.67-0.81), PACmax (AUC: 0.7386 95% IC: 0.67-0.81) and PACmax/C (AUC: 0.7546 95% IC: 0.68-0.82). A mean basal P vein PAC of 678 pmol/L provides a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 41%, PACmax/C of 3.63 provides a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 43%, while a PACmax of 2128 pmol/L provides a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 47% to exclude cases of bilateral disease. Conclusion: P mean basal PAC and PACmax and PACmax/C following ACTH are higher in basal and ACTH lateralized PA than in the other groups. BAH patients have a higher relative increase in P PAC than basal and post-ACTH lateralized PA. The selected P PAC cutoff values fail to adequately distinguish all groups and cannot replace the requirement to conduct AVS. References: (1) El Ghorayeb et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;101:1826-1835. (2) Zwermann et al., Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160 (3):443-451 (3) Jiang et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(5):1837–44.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207