MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944698794

Information Communication Technology-Enabled Platforms and P&C Insurance Consumption: Evidence from Emerging & Developing Economies

2019· article· en· W2944698794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ashu Tiwari, Archana Patro, Imlak Shaikh

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Economics and Finance · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Information and Communications TechnologyContext (archaeology)Risk aversion (psychology)BusinessProperty insurancePopularityConventional PCIMarketingEconomicsActuarial scienceInsurance policyCasualty insuranceFinancial economicsComputer sciencePolitical scienceGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many business domains are benefitted with the fast diffusion of Information Communication Technology (ICT) -enabled platforms in society. But, ICT-enabled services have not received similar popularity across all domains despite rapid growth in ICT-based services. In the area of property and casualty insurance, the ICT adoption rate has been slow compared to other domains. The earlier literature in the domain attributed it to the product complexity. This paper argues that the impact of ICT-enabled platforms may have different outcomes on property and casualty insurance consumption due to risk aversion. In insurance literature, risk aversion has been proxied by many factors. As per the literature, secondary education has a positive impact on PCI (Property & Casualty Insurance) consumption while tertiary education has a negative impact on PCI consumption. In the context, this current study has empirically tested the impact of ICT-enabled platforms on PCI consumption in emerging markets and developing countries. The study found that secondary education has no significant impact on adoption of ICT platforms. However, tertiary education reduces the negative impact of ICT-enabled platform whereas Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI) increases the magnitude of negative impact of ICT adoption on PCI consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Economics and FinanceSame topicTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourFrench-language works237,207