Proximity-dependent biotinylation mediated by TurboID to identify protein–protein interaction networks in yeast
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of proximity-dependent biotinylation assays coupled to mass spectrometry (PDB-MS) has changed the field of protein-protein interaction studies. However, despite the recurrent and successful use of BioID-based protein-protein interactions screening in mammalian cells, the implementation of PDB-MS in yeast has not been effective. Here, we report a simple and rapid approach in yeast to effectively screen for proximal and interacting proteins in their natural cellular environment by using TurboID, a recently described version of the BirA biotin ligase. Using the protein arginine methyltransferase Rmt3 and the RNA exosome subunits, Rrp6 and Dis3, the application of PDB-MS in yeast by using TurboID was able to recover protein-protein interactions previously identified using other biochemical approaches and provided new complementary information for a given protein bait. The development of a rapid and effective PDB assay that can systematically analyze protein-protein interactions in living yeast cells opens the way for large-scale proteomics studies in this powerful model organism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it