KAJIAN MOTIVASI DALAM UPAYA PENCAPAIAN TUJUAN PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PEMUDA INDONESIA-KANADA 2014-2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Youths are the hope and determining achievement factors of a country’s future success. International youth exchange program, in this case Indonesia-Canada Youth Exchange Program (ICYEP) 2014-2015, has been one of the options taken by the two countries. Motivations of young people to join ICYEP 2014-2015 are strongly related to the achievement of ICYEP 2014-2015 objectives. Douglas McGregor’s Theory Y and Daniel Pink’s Self-Determination Theory can be used to explain their motivations. ICYEP 2014-2015 provides ways for its participants to achieve their motivations. The motivations, in turns, ends in the achievement of the objectives of ICYEP 2014-2015 having been outlined by the Ministry of Youth and Sport of the Republic of Indonesia (Kemenpora RI) and Canada World Youth (CWY). Utilizing qualitative method, this research aims to identify participants’ motivations to participate in ICYEP 2014-2015, achievements, constraints, and relations to the accomplishment of the objectives of ICYEP 2014-2015. The research results display that there are various kinds of motivations supporting research subjects’ decisions to participate in ICYEP 2014-2015, and this program provides the right paths to attain their motivations. There are correlations between the achievement of research subjects’ motivations and the accomplishment of ICYEP 2014-2015. Keywords: motivations, Indonesia, Canada, youth exchange program, objectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".