Preparation and characterization of amphoteric cellulose–montmorillonite composite beads with a controllable porous structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Conventional amphoteric and porous materials are often synthetic and polymer based; this tends to raise environmental concerns because of their poor biodegradability. To address this issue, novel natural‐polymer‐ or amphoteric‐modified cellulose and MOt (ACeOMt) composite beads with a typical mesoporous structure were developed in this study. These green‐based porous beads, consisting of regenerated bagasse cellulose and oxalic acid modified montmorillonite (OMt), were successfully prepared by a facile coagulation method with fine calcium carbonate as a pore‐forming agent. The beads with the best sphericity were obtained at a 1:1 weight ratio of cellulose to OMt. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed that ACeOMt possessed a smooth surface with abundant macropores. X‐ray diffraction and thermogravimetric analysis characterizations demonstrated the success of the modification of montmorillonite and cellulose. The results of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis indicate the presence of a typical mesoporous structure in the composite with a relatively high specific surface area. The resulting ACeOMt are expected to be biodegradable, nonhazardous, and applicable for various uses, including adsorption, chromatography, and soil remediation. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019 , 136 , 47941.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".