MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2944829792 · doi:10.1002/jcb.28979

Novel c.G630A <i>TCIRG1</i> mutation causes aberrant splicing resulting in an unusually mild form of autosomal recessive osteopetrosis

2019· article· en· W2944829792 on OpenAlexafffund
Ralph Zirngibl, Andrew Wang, Yeqi Yao, Morris F. Manolson, Joerg Krueger, Lucie Dupuis, Roberto Mendoza‐Londono, Irina Voronov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBone Metabolism and Diseases
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTCIRG1OsteopetrosisExonOsteoclastBiologyMutationMolecular biologyRNA splicingAlternative splicingGeneticsT cellGeneImmunologyRNAImmune systemCD28

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (ARO) is a severe genetic bone disease characterized by high bone density due to mutations that affect formation or function of osteoclasts. Mutations in the a 3 subunit of the vacuolar‐type H + ‐ATPase (encoded by T‐cell immune regulator 1 [ TCIRG1 ]) are responsible for ~50% of all ARO cases. We identified a novel TCIRG1 (c.G630A) mutation responsible for an unusually mild form of the disease. To characterize this mutation, osteoclasts were differentiated using peripheral blood monocytes from the patient (c.G630A/c.G630A), male sibling (+/+), unaffected female sibling (+/c.G630A), and unaffected parent (+/c.G630A). Osteoclast formation, bone‐resorbing function, TCIRG1 protein, and mRNA expression levels were assessed. The c.G630A mutation did not affect osteoclast differentiation; however, bone‐resorbing function was decreased. Both TCIRG1 protein and full‐length TCIRG1 mRNA expression levels were also diminished in the affected patient's sample. The c.G630A mutation replaces the last nucleotide of exon 6 and may cause splicing defects. We analyzed the TCIRG1 splicing pattern between exons 4 to 8 and detected deletions of exons 5, 6, 7, and 5‐6 (ΔE56). These deletions were only observed in c.G630A/c.G630A and +/c.G630A samples, but not in +/+ controls. Among these deletions, only ΔE56 maintained the reading frame and was predicted to generate an 85 kDa protein. Exons 5‐6 encode an uncharacterized portion of the cytoplasmic N‐terminal domain of a 3, a domain not involved in proton translocation. To investigate the effect of ΔE56 on V‐ATPase function, we transformed yeast with plasmids carrying full‐length or truncated Vph1p, the yeast ortholog of a 3. Both proteins were expressed; however, ΔE56‐Vph1p transformed yeast failed to grow on Zn 2+ ‐containing plates, a growth assay dependent on V‐ATPase‐mediated vacuolar acidification. In conclusion, our results show that the ΔE56 truncated protein is not functional, suggesting that the mild ARO phenotype observed in the patient is likely due to the residual full‐length protein expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicBone Metabolism and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207