A Comparison of Cross‐Track Ion Drift Measured by the Swarm Satellites and Plasma Convection Velocity Measured by SuperDARN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cross‐track ion drifts measured by the Swarm A satellite are compared with colocated line‐of‐sight Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) velocities in approximately the same directions. More than 200 Swarm A passes over four polar cap SuperDARN radars in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres are considered. Overall, the Swarm‐based velocities are larger than the SuperDARN velocities; the slope of the best fit line to the data is ~0.67. Somewhat stronger differences are found when Swarm A measurements for the entire year 2016 are compared with SuperDARN vector data from global‐scale convection maps. Swarm ion drift data demonstrate known features of the high‐latitude convection patterns, for example, reverse convection cells at interplanetary magnetic field Βz > 0. The latitudes of the convection reversal boundary inferred from SuperDARN are found to be in reasonable agreement with those determined from Swarm A and Swarm B, with Swarm‐based latitudes occurring roughly 1° more equatorward, typically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".