Bismuth-surfactant-induced growth and structure of InAs/GaAs(110) quantum dots
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We explore the Bi-surfactant-directed self-assembly and structure of InAs quantum dots (QDs) grown on GaAs(110) by molecular beam epitaxy. The addition of a Bi flux during InAs deposition changes the InAs growth mode from two-dimensional (2D) Frank–van der Merwe to Stranski–Krastanov (SK), resulting in the formation of three-dimensional (3D) InAs islands on the surface. Furthermore, exposing static InAs 2D layers to Bi induces a rearrangement of the strained layer into 3D islands. We explore the effect of varying the InAs thickness and Bi flux for these two growth approaches, observing a critical thickness for 3D island formation in both cases. Characterization of (110) InAs QDs with high-resolution transmission electron microscopy reveals that larger islands grown by the SK mode are plastically relaxed, while small islands grown by the on-demand approach are coherent. Strain relaxation along the [ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mover accent="true"> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="true">¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:math> ] direction is achieved by 90° pure-edge dislocations with dislocation lines running along [001]. In contrast, strain relief along [001] is by 60° misfit dislocations. This behavior is consistent with observations of planar (In, Ga)As/GaAs(110) layers. These results illustrate how surfactant Bi can provoke and control QD formation where it normally does not occur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it