Transcriptome-wide association study of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder identifies associated genes and phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. Previous studies have shown that the disorder is highly heritable and associated with several different risk-taking behaviors. Additionally, brain-imaging studies have identified various brain regions such as the cerebellum and frontal cortex to be altered in ADHD. Large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several loci associated with ADHD. However, understanding the biological relevance of these genetic loci has proven to be difficult. Here, we conducted the largest ADHD transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) to date consisting of 19,099 cases and 34,194 controls and identified 9 transcriptome-wide significant hits. We successfully demonstrate that several previous GWAS hits can be largely explained by expression. Probabilistic causal fine-mapping of TWAS signals prioritized KAT2B with a posterior probability of 0.467 in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and TMEM161B with a posterior probability of 0.838 in the amygdala. Furthermore, pathway enrichments identified dopaminergic and norepinephrine pathways, which are highly relevant for ADHD. Finally, we used the top eQTLs associated with the TWAS genes to identify phenotypes relevant to ADHD and found an inverse genetic correlation with educational attainment and a positive correlation with “ever smoker”, maternal smoking at birth, BMI, and schizophrenia. Overall, our findings highlight the power of TWAS to identify novel risk loci and prioritize putatively causal genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".