MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945009381 · doi:10.1002/advs.201900712

Prediction of DNA Integrity from Morphological Parameters Using a Single‐Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index Assay

2019· article· en· W2945009381 on OpenAlex
Yihe Wang, Jason Riordon, Tian Fook Kong, Yi Xu, Brian Nguyen, Junjie Zhong, Jae Bem You, Alexander Lagunov, Thomas Hannam, Keith Jarvi, David Sinton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalOttawa Fertility CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoCalifornia HIV/AIDS Research Program
KeywordsSpermDNA fragmentationAcridine orangeBiologyLogistic regressionAndrologyLinear regressionBiological systemStatisticsMathematicsGeneticsMedicineStaining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is a popular form of in vitro fertilization, where single sperm are selected by a clinician and injected into an egg. Whereas clinicians employ general morphology‐based guidelines to select the healthiest‐looking sperm, it remains unclear to what extent an individual sperm's physical parameters correlate with the quality of internal DNA cargo—a measurement that cannot be obtained without first damaging the sperm. Herein, a single‐cell DNA fragmentation index (DFI) assay is demonstrated, which combines the single‐cell nature of the acridine orange test with the quantitative aspect of the sperm chromatin structure assay, to create a database of DFI‐scored brightfield images. Two regression predictive models, linear and nonlinear regression, are used to quantify the correlations between individual sperm morphological parameters and DFI score (with model test r at 0.558 and 0.620 for linear and nonlinear regression models, respectively). The sample is also split into two categories of either relatively good or bad DFIs and a classification predictive model based on logistic regression is used to categorize sperm, resulting in a test accuracy of 0.827. Here, the first systematic study is presented on the correlation and prediction of sperm DNA integrity from morphological parameters at the single‐cell level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it